Taiwan suffered one of the world’s most memorable plane crashes this past week when a plane went down in Taipei soon after takeoff and plunged into a river. There were only 15 survivors, with 36 confirmed dead and the rest missing as of today (Saturday Taiwan time).
However, what was amazing is that the turboprop plane went down and chipped a bridge, which was captured by the dashcams of several cars that were ON the bridge, before it flew into the river. The pilot had enough presence of mind to manuever the diving plane away from the bridge and nearby apartment buildings and into the river, avoiding a high number of casualties in the buildings and allowing several lucky passengers on the plane to survive. However, an investigation has shown that a “professional error” might have been made as one engine had stopped working after takeoff but that the other engine was shut off instead.
This was yet another disaster for the airline TransAsia Airways, which also suffered a deadly plane crash last July landing on Penghu. The airline TransAsia Airways flies mainly short routes from Taiwan to outlying islands, mainland China, Japan and a few destinations in Southeast Asia. To have two deadly crashes with one year, and six accidents in the last years, is far too much for such an airline and I wonder if it may soon cease to exist.
Taipei’s new mayor Ko Wen-je caused some controversy in an interview when he stated that colonization made Singapore, HK, and Taiwan better than each other and China. In a quite blunt interview, while some of his remarks were a bit politically-incorrect, some of them also made sense. He spoke about much more than just culture and colonialism, as he talked about Taiwan, relations with the mainland, the Chinese Communist party.
Regarding his comment on how colonization made Singapore better than HK (both British colonies), HK better than Taiwan, and Taiwan (which was a Japanese colony during the early 20th century up until the mid-1940s) better than China, I think his point is not about colonization being good but more about the possible problems with Chinese society. Nevertheless there are some who have perceived Ko’s comments as supporting colonization and critiqued his interview. However, it is important that Ko was speaking about specifically the four Chinese-speaking places – China, Taiwan, Hong Kong and Singapore. Ko never said colonization was good for African nations or India, Burma or the Philippines.
Now one can argue HK and Singapore are both city-states while Taiwan is a small island, so it stands that the mainland would certainly be more disorganized and less developed. Also, Taiwan may have been colonized by the Japanese, who built highways and institutions such as its best university National Taiwan University, but the other good aspects of its society – democracy, free media, independent judiciary, universal health insurance system – were devised and undertaken by the Taiwanese themselves. However, one can also counter-argue that Taiwan is not as efficiently run as Singapore or Hong Kong, and that some of its much vaunted democracy have been eroded in recent times, such as corruption and the local media, whose poor quality is sneered at by both Taiwanese and expats.
Even so, there is no question that society in those three places are much more open, free, and “civilized” than the mainland’s. Answering another question, he made a hearty endorsement of the US, where he lived for one year, and its freedom.
He also said Vietnam had a better culture than China despite being much poorer. While I only have 10 days’ experience of being in Vietnam, I’d say society there seems much more laid-back, pleasant and less materialistic than China’s. Vietnam also seemed to have a more traditional society, which is not surprising given it is much smaller and more importantly, did not go through a Cultural Revolution, the period of madness when mainlanders were manipulated by the party into attacking each other and destroying many facets of Chinese culture. Of course, Vietnam also has similar problems like China – censored media, corruption and a fair share of hustlers.
Taipei, as much as I can criticize it, is a very decent city to live in, as confirmed by its placing 7th on this list of livable Asian cities done by a British consulting firm. Singapore is number one, followed by Osaka, Nagoya, Tokyo and Yokohama. Hong Kong is in 6th place, while Seoul is 10th. Shanghai is 13th while Beijing is 18th. Globally, Taipei is 65th which is still alright given the firm looked at over 450 cities (Shanghai is 110th globally).